Pulse Mate — Arterial Line Placement Training Device — image 1
Pulse Mate — Arterial Line Placement Training Device — image 2
Pulse Mate — Arterial Line Placement Training Device — image 3
Pulse Mate — Arterial Line Placement Training Device — image 4

Pulse Mate — Arterial Line Placement Training Device

VentureWell E-Team
Medical DeviceEmbedded SystemsDuke EGRPatent Pending

A low-cost, single-operator radial arterial line placement trainer with electronic pulse simulation and touchscreen control. VentureWell E-Team, Duke University. Patent Pending.

R. Blue · A. Gupta · C. Wyrtzen · N. Trigger | Team PATS — Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University
BOM Cost
~$190
Target sell: $500
Throughput
50×/day
Uses per day
Skin Durability
300+
Punctures per wrap
Operators
1
No assistant required

Problem

Arterial line insertion involves puncturing the radial artery and threading a catheter to continuously monitor inpatient blood pressure. A study of 357 incoming interns found that only 36.7% had any training in arterial line insertion — averaging just one attempted insertion during all of medical school.

Common complications from inadequate training include pain, swelling, and thrombosis. Major complications occur in ~1% of insertions, affecting an estimated 19,617 patients annually in the US.

Existing Arterial Line Placement Trainers (ALPTs) cost $700–$3,500 and suffer from three key limitations:

  1. Require two operators — a second person must manually squeeze a bulb to simulate the pulse
  2. Reveal prior puncture sites — visible marks let trainees locate the artery by sight, removing the palpation task
  3. High cost — limits availability to well-funded simulation centers

Pulse Mate

Pulse Mate is a medium-fidelity ALPT built around a repurposed manikin arm. A silicone skin wrap covers tubing embedded in a tissue-simulating insertion medium above the wrist. Simulation blood fills the closed-loop tubing connecting a pump, the artificial artery, and a reservoir — creating a pulsatile feel driven entirely by the electronic control system.

Features

FeatureDetail
Full procedureCatheter threading and guide wire insertion are possible; blood draws into the catheter canal like a real patient
TroubleshootingSimulates realistic maneuvers taught during training (withdrawal, rotation, re-advance)
Touchscreen UIAdjustable BPM, diastolic pressure, and systolic pressure — unique among ALPTs
Electronic pulseNo second operator needed; pulse is generated by the onboard pump system
Multiple skin tonesReplaceable silicone wraps available in multiple tones
Replaceable partsSkin wraps last 300+ punctures; internal tubing is also user-replaceable

Physician Validation

Tested with 7 attending physicians and residents at Duke Hospital, advised by Dr. Carlos Falcon (Duke Simulation Specialist) and Dr. Ankeet Udani (Head of Duke Hospital Simulation Lab).

Question Mean ± SD
How realistic does the arm look?5.87 ± 0.83
How realistic does puncturing the arm feel?5.63 ± 1.60
How realistic does the pulse feel?6.14 ± 0.38
How realistic is the feedback after the artery is punctured?6.00 ± 0.93
How easy was the device to use?6.38 ± 0.74

Likert scale 1–7. n = 7 physicians and residents, Duke Hospital.


Market Comparison

Device Cost Pulse Control User Interface Operators Durability
Pulse Mate $$ Advanced (BPM + pressure) Touchscreen 1 Advanced (replaceable)
Life Form Trainer $$$ Elementary None 2 Elementary
GTSImulators Trainer $$$$$ Advanced None 1 Elementary

Market

Total Available Market
$1.9B
Medical simulation market (2021); projected $3.2–$7.7B by 2027
Serviceable Available Market
~350 facilities
200+ medical schools and 650+ simulation labs — filtered to simulation-focused institutions
Initial Target
$31–47K
2–3 units to 50 regional simulation labs at $500/unit

3D Model — Revision 3

Project Documents

© 2026 Nicholas Trigger